On 21 Jun 2013, at 08:23, "Jörg Knappen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> My opinion on the cedilla mess is the following: > > * Add preemptively LATIN [CAPITAL|LOWERCASE] LETTER * WITH CEDILLA ATTACHED > for every Latvian/Livonian character currently in UNicode. Why? Latvian and Livonian don't use letters with "proper" cedilla attached. > (Don't use terms like MARSHALLESE [CAPITAL|LOWERCASE] LETTER [M|N] -- such > entities don't exist from a character encoding point of view.) Yes they do. Cf. U+0406 CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER BYELORUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN I. The character name exists to distinguish it from other characters and to guide the user in the character's use. > * Declare the list of exceptions to Cedilla rendering officially closed. > Whenever another such thing (say, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER P WITH COMMA BELOW / > LATIN LOWERCASE LETTER P WITH TURNED COMMA ABOVE) occurs in real life, it > will be encoded ... WITH COMMA BELOW. I think that is understood, but where would you "declare" this? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
