On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:48:18 +0100 Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2013, at 19:38, Kent Karlsson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would agree, and in addition, > > AB3E;LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER O WITH STROKE;Ll;0;L;;;;;N;;;;; > > should have a compatibility decomposition to > > 00F8;LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE;Ll > > I don't agree. This is a phonetic letter not a glyph variant of a > regular letter. It having a compatibility decomposition makes at least as much sense as most spacing superscript and subscript letters having compatibility decompositions. Richard.
