> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:32:15 -0700 > From: Ilya Zakharevich <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>, > unicode Unicode Discussion <[email protected]>, James Clark > <[email protected]> > > Sorry, I do not see any definition here. Just a collection of words > which looks like a definition, but only locally…
Any definition is just a collection of words, of course. Can you tell what is missing from this collection to make it eligible? > 1( 2[ 3( 4] 5) 6) > > Is looking-at-1 forcing match of 3-and-5? Or what? No. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
