On 6/2/2014 2:53 PM, Markus Scherer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, David Starner <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:I would especially discourage any web browser from handling these; they're noncharacters used for unknown purposes that are undisplayable and if used carelessly for their stated purpose, can probably trigger serious bugs in some lamebrained utility.I don't expect "handling these" in web browsers and lamebrained utilities. I expect "treat like unassigned code points".
I can't shake the suspicion that Corrigendum #9 is not actually solving a general problem, but is a special favor to CLDR as being run by insiders, and in the process muddying the waters for everyone else.
A./
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
