On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:09:27 +0900 "Martin J. Dürst" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd strongly suggest that completely independent of when and how > Corrigendum #9 gets tweaked or fixed, a quick and firm plan gets > worked out for how to get rid of these codepoints in CLDR data. The > sooner, the better. I suspect this has already been done. I know of no CLDR text files still containing them. Richard. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
