On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Richard Wordingham <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:21:38 -0700 > David Starner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Richard Wordingham >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Using 99 = (3 + >> > 32 + 64) PUA characters, one can ape UTF-16 surrogates and encode: > > The PUA is in general not available for > general utilities to make special use of.
No, the PUA is not. Then where are you getting the 99 PUA characters you suggested using? -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
