On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jean-François Colson <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve found a 16-year-old proposal for Blissymbolics ( > http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/bliss.pdf ) but nothing more > recent. Was that script rejected? Was it forgotten? Are there any technical > difficulties related to that proposal?
http://www.unicode.org/pending/pending.html#initial_and_exploratory Proposals in Initial and Exploratory Stage The scripts in this stage have had preliminary proposals for encoding submitted to the Unicode Technical Committee and/or ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2, but these proposals are not yet complete, and further information is required in order to evaluate them, so that they may progress toward encoding. They may not yet have undergone technical review, either for lack of relevant expertise or simply because the material itself is exploratory in nature. Review Input Requested: For these proposals, the UTC is seeking expert feedback to assist in completing the proposals to the level where a well-formed encoding can be technically evaluated, and where there can be reasonable assurance that at least the basic repertoire is presented concisely and completely in a manner consistent with the encoding practices of the committees. Expert reviewers of these scripts may be able to work with the proposers by contacting the Script Encoding Initiative. ... Blissymbolics ... markus _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
