Le 14/10/14 00:22, Michael Everson a écrit :
Marcus, that was ill-informed. No reason to give to Jean-françois a generic FAQ
entry.
Better to describe the UTC discussion about the script. Their chief concern at
that time was that the user community were still creating new characters. The
user community has been working on this in the intervening years, and Bliss is
much closer to maturity for encoding.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
The script wasn’t mature enough. Does that mean that the shape of many
characters changed in the following years?
You say their chief concern was that the user community were still
creating new characters. But isn’t that inherent to most living
ideographic scripts? Aren’t there new characters that appear here and
there in Chinese/Japanese/Korean?
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
