Well, the same reasoning could also argue for the contra-positive (a→b ⊨ ¬b→¬a): that UTC should not consider endorsing such a tag scheme.
Peter From: William_J_G Overington [mailto:wjgo_10...@btinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:54 AM To: unicode@unicode.org; Peter Constable; eric.mul...@efele.net; asmus-...@ix.netcom.com Subject: Re: Tag characters Peter Constable wrote as follows: > Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service? Well, Unicode is about precision, interoperability and long-term stability, and, given, in relation to one particular specified base character followed by some tag characters, that a particular sequence of Unicode characters is intended to lead to the display of an image representing a particular flag, it seems to me highly reasonable that the Unicode Technical Committee might seriously consider providing that facility. William Overington 27 May 2015
