On 06/20/2015 03:02 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Ken Whistler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This results from the fact that the fallback behavior for the modifiers is simply as independent pictographic blorts, i.e. the color swatch images. That is also related to why they are treated as gc=Sk symbol modifiers, rather than as combining marks or format characters. If you *support* emoji modifier sequences, then yes, you should treat them as single grapheme clusters for editing -- but their behavior is more akin then to ligatures or conjuncts than to combining character sequences. You need additional, specific knowledge about these sequences -- it doesn't just fall out from a *default* implementation of UAX #29 rules for grapheme clusters. Looks like this would be a good FAQ addition...
Yes please
Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis> / / /— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —/ //////
