BTW, Karl, one of our TODOs is to look at the breaking behavior of the emoji sequences....
Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis> *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —* On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Karl Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/20/2015 03:02 AM, Mark Davis [image: ☕]️ wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Ken Whistler <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> This results from the fact that the fallback behavior for the >> modifiers is >> simply as independent pictographic blorts, i.e. the color swatch >> images. >> That is also related to why they are treated as gc=Sk symbol >> modifiers, >> rather than as combining marks or format characters. >> >> If you *support* emoji modifier sequences, then yes, you should treat >> them as single grapheme clusters for editing -- but their behavior is >> more akin then to ligatures or conjuncts than to combining character >> sequences. You need additional, specific >> knowledge about these sequences -- it doesn't just fall out from a >> *default* implementation of UAX #29 rules for grapheme clusters. >> >> >> Looks like this would be a good FAQ addition... >> > > Yes please > > >> >> >> Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis> >> / >> / >> /— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —/ >> ////// >> > >
