On 28 June 2015 at 21:16, gfb hjjhjh <c933...@gmail.com> wrote: > > oh and by the way, could you (or someone else) please help look for the > character ⿰亻革 also?
Not in the pipeline as far as I can see. > Just seen a Chinese Wikipedia article introducing an > ethnic group with the character as partvof its name > https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/(亻革)家人 but without a proper character for > so. The article sourced a CCTV program for ots origin. ... which calls them "革家", and so is not evidence for the existence of the character "亻革" (I don't doubt that the character exists, but neither the Wikipedia article nor the CCTV web page are sufficient evidence for it). > And there seem to be a dozen more wikipedia article that contain unencoded > han characters, as listed in > https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:含有未收錄漢字的条目 There are some 60 unencoded CJK characters in use on Wikimedia projects (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Chinese_characters_not_in_Unicode), which I include in my "BabelStone Han PUA" font (see U+F2D6..U+F2EF, U+F2FD..U+F2FF, U+F3E0, U+F4C0..U+F4E1 listed at http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Fonts/PUA.html). The problem with most of these characters is that Wikipedia is not a suitable source for encoding, and evidence for use of these characters in printed sources needs to be presented to the UTC and IRG for them to have any chance of being encoded. For an example of what you should do to get these characters encoded see the latest revision of Ming Fan's "Proposal to add 94 Chinese characters to UAX #45" (http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2015/15098r3-chinese.pdf). Andrew
