Sean Leonard wrote: > Additionally as Peter stated, an expression including "Basic Latin > block" (e.g., characters beyond the Basic Latin block) could work.
I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of code points instead of a separate encoding standard. -- Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
