Martin J. Dürst wrote: >> I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be > > Is that non-Basic Latin or not Basic-Latin? > >> useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of >> code points instead of a separate encoding standard. > > But as a three-component term with unclear structure, it's confusing > by itself.
That's why I wrote "non <EN DASH> Basic <HYPHEN-MINUS> Latin." But I realize that not all fonts will show this clearly, and that the distinction is lost in speech anyway. -- Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
