Le mardi, 29 septembre 2015 à 21:03, Richard Wordingham a écrit : > Too wordy and clearly prone to error!
Yes and maybe that "average engineer" does not understand negation. So clearly any of non-ASCII, non-Basic Latin or greater than U+007F cannot fit. Bring in the bureaucrats, new terminology is needed, there are not enough useless definitions in the Unicode standard, let's add a few more. Daniel
