Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples

has these two rules

NU × (NU | SY | IS)

NU (NU | SY | IS)* × (NU | SY | IS | CL | CP )

It appears to me that the first rule generates a subset of what the 2nd rule generates, and so is useless. It could be hence removed for simplicity, unless I'm missing something or there is a typo and it is meant to generate something else.

Reply via email to