On 01/11/2016 10:55 PM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
Looks that way to me too. Can you submit this as feedback?
will do
{phone}
On Jan 12, 2016 00:39, "Karl Williamson" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
has these two rules
NU × (NU | SY | IS)
NU (NU | SY | IS)* × (NU | SY | IS | CL | CP )
It appears to me that the first rule generates a subset of what the
2nd rule generates, and so is useless. It could be hence removed
for simplicity, unless I'm missing something or there is a typo and
it is meant to generate something else.
