On 1/6/2016 3:27 PM, Shawn Steele wrote: 

[…]

> Teach them right the first time. They’ll never use a code page. 

On 6 Jan 2016 15:32:33, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote:

[…]

> +1 

On 11 Jan 2016 14:22:53, Albrecht Dreiheller wrote:

[…]

> When setting up a requirement specification for a font manufacturer for a new 
> font for Chinese […], there is no easy way to define the character repertoire 
> without refering to the code pages […].

Among the many uses of code pages, this thread was focusing on training for 
computer scientists. If enlarging the subject to cover font design and possibly 
keyboard input as well is really useful, then from a German POV it might be 
interesting to look up the discussion at 
http://www.typografie.info/3/topic/26274-liste-unbedingt-notwendiger-zeichen/ 
Retrieved January 7, 2016.

For *IT students* (and other people as well), the day they encounter their 
first “U+”, it is straightforward either to look up some pieces of information 
about Unicode, since they have already a strong experience of the internet; or 
at least if they donʼt (and anyway), to use the Contact form to submit their 
questions. While the interest *on the whole* wonʼt be missing, the actual 
problem is oversolliciting and misdirecting the interest through the 
entertainment and advertising industries. The attention as a limited resource 
is even uselessly threatened through the side-effects of consumption (food, …). 

Checking these problems is a matter of on-going efforts. I just would like to 
complete the discussion on that side.

[By this occasion I apologize for my last and previous e-mails; I hope I got 
some skill to stop bothering uselessly, and to hopefully focus on the topics 
Iʼm able to do some useful work in. Soon I should send a link FWIW.]

Best regards,

Marcel

Reply via email to