|
On 10/6/2016 12:44 PM, Garth Wallace
wrote:
Bit arithmetic was used for ASCII-only systems to do case mappings. I'm sure it had its advantages in the times of severely constrained memory and very slow processors, but it's really not extensible, is it? Offset calculations are commonly performed on digits, even today; so it would not be too much of a stretch to expect that for a subset of symbols for which there is a need of a common processing step, there might be attention paid to making easy offset calculations possible. A./ |
- Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Garth Wallace
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Asmus Freytag (c)
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Philippe Verdy
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Ken Whistler
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Garth Wallace
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Garth Wallace
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode characters? Ken Shirriff
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode character... Philippe Verdy
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode char... Garth Wallace
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unicode ... Mark Davis ☕️
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unic... Hans Åberg
- Re: Bit arithmetic on Unic... Marcel Schneider

