On 10/6/2016 12:44 PM, Garth Wallace wrote:
Some representatives of the WFCC have proposed alternate arrangements that assume there will be a need for bitwise operations to covert between the existing chess symbols in the Miscellaneous Symbols block and related symbols in the new block. I don't see the need but maybe I'm missing something.
I don't think you are missing anything. Bitwise operations would certainly *not* be needed in a case like this. Small lookup and mapping tables would suffice.
--Ken
