I believe there's already a court ruling that say languages and words are not copyrightablein the case about loglan, although the trademarkability of an language is another matter.
2016年11月5日 01:42 於 "David Faulks" <[email protected]> 寫道： > > On Thu, 11/3/16, Mark Shoulson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: The (Klingon) Empire Strikes Back > > > At the time of writing this letter it has not yet hit the UTC > > Document Register, but I have recently submitted a document > > revisiting the ever-popular issue of the encoding of Klingon > > "pIqaD". The reason always given why it could not be > > encoded was that it did not enjoy enough usage, and so I've > > collected a bunch of examples to demonstrate that this is not > > true (scans and also web pages, etc.) So the issue comes > > back up, and time to talk about it again. > > There is another issue of course, which I think could be a huge obstacle: > the Trademark/Copyright issue. Paramount claims copyright over the entire > Klingon language (presumably including the script). The issue has recently > gone to court. Encoding criteria for symbols (and this likely extends to > letters) is against encoding them without the permission of the > Copyright/Trademark holder. > > Is Paramount endorsing your proposal? > > <snip> > > > ~mark > > David Faulks > > > > > > >
