Mark E. Shoulson wrote: > At any rate, this isn't Unicode's problem. Unicode would not be > creating anything in Klingon anyway!
Well, to be fair, I thought IPR was the primary reason Unicode had never encoded the Apple logo either. I doubt that whether Unicode intended to use such a character themselves was a factor. (Of course, users who really wanted that character encoded are probably using 🍎 or 🍏 now.) -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
