On Wednesday 23 November 2016 at 11:22, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Thank you for your reply, but I don't think the UAX, specifically the > line you quoted implies that. The line you quoted says that the process > is terminated when a rule matches and produces a boundary status. In > Table 1[1], the right-arrow (which is used in rule 4) is listed as a > boundary symbol,
Precisely, rules with this *symbol* do not produce a boundary *status* which is either boundary or not boundary as mentioned in parens in the line I quoted. > so I would argue that one should stop the process and start it again from the > start. At least in the current UAX there is no mention of an idea of stopping and restarting the process at all. Best, Daniel
