Richard Wordingham wrote: > I think it is not a 'typographical error' if it renders as it should!
What if it renders correctly on some systems but not on others? I do see your point, though. Writing systems that permit different spellings of the same glyph (cluster), only one of which is 'correct' even after normalization, can be tricky like this. I think this would still be a matter of 'misspelling' rather than 'miscoding' because a typist should not have to be concerned with character codes per se. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
