On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:27:52 -0800 Markus Scherer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Richard Wordingham < > [email protected]> wrote: > > 2) Claims that logical_order_exception is relevant for searching > > (TUS, as above) > It informs the construction of the DUCET and could be used to > suppress_contractions in a search tailoring (see CLDR root collation > data file). It is irrelevant for searching. If one created a collation just for searching, one wouldn't have to remove the effects of this irrelevant property. Richard.
