> `150` in UN M.49 which ISO 3166-1 was derived from and is compatible with. CLDR could safely adopt that if needed.
No need to "safely adopt". It is already valid: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/proposed.html#flag-emoji-tag-sequences If you follow the links you'll end up at http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/common/validity/region.xml And find that 150 is already valid. (For the format of that file, see LDML.) ==== Where people have looked at the documentation and their questions are still not answered, that feedback is useful so that the documentation can be improved. But it appears that at least some people haven't bothered to do that, when it could answer a lot of the questions/complaints on this list. Mark On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Christoph Päper < [email protected]> wrote: > Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> hat am 30. März 2017 um 00:40 > geschrieben: > > > There's no ISO 3166-1 code for Europe at the whole (does it exist > legally if > > we can't clearly define its borders?) > > `150` in UN M.49 which ISO 3166-1 was derived from and is compatible with. > CLDR > could safely adopt that if needed. > > No alpha-2 and hence no RIS sequence, though. An Emoji Tag Sequence would > be > straight-forward, though: U+1F3F4-E0031-E0035-E0030-E007F. > >
