> What the UTC is looking for is commitments from major vendors. Well should it be applying such a filter on progress?
I opine that assessment should be on merit and that new ideas should be considered on an even-handed basis. Progress should not be on the basis of what major vendors choose to do. Requiring commitments from major vendors could be a barrier to new enterprises developing and a barrier to progress for the benefit of consumers being made. > Of course, there is some judgment involved as to what constitutes "major": at > one extreme clearly 1B DAUs qualifies, and at the other extreme, 1K doesn't. What does 1B DAUs mean please? William Overington Thursday 30 March 2017
