Re: Can NFKC turn valid UAX 31 identifiers into non-identifiers?

[Asmus Freytag via Unicode]

On 6/6/2018 2:25 PM, Hans Åberg via Unicode wrote: On 4 Jun 2018, at 21:49, Manish Goregaokar via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: The Rust community is considering adding non-ascii identifiers, which follow UAX #31 (XID_Start XID_Continue*, with tweaks). The proposal also asks for identifiers to be treated as equivalent under NFKC. So, in this language, if one defines a projection function 𝜋 and the usual constant π, what is 𝜋(π) supposed to mean? - Just curious. In a language where one writes ASCII "pi" instead, what is pi(pi) supposed to mean? A./