On 12/17/2019 11:31 AM, James Kass via
Unicode wrote:
So it follows that any justification operation should treat NO-BREAK SPACE and SPACE identically. And any recommendation that is not compatible with what the overwhelming majority of software has been doing should be ignored (or only enabled on explicit user input). Otherwise, you'll just advocating for a massively breaking change. NBSP has been supported since way before Unicode. It's way past the point where we can legislate behavior other than the de-facto consensus among implementations. Now, if someone can show us that there are widespread implementations that follow the above recommendation and have no interoperability issues with HTML then I may change my tune. A./ |
- Fwd: NBSP supposed to stretch, right? QSJN 4 UKR via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, righ... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, ... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stret... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to ... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: NB... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, righ... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, ... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stret... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to ... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, right? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, right? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, right? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, right? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode