On 20/03/2020 23:41, Adam Borowski via Unicode wrote: > Also, UTF-8 can carry more than Unicode -- for example, U+D800..U+DFFF or > U+11000..U+7FFFFFFF (or possibly even up to 2³⁶ or 2⁴²), which has its uses > but is not well-formed Unicode.
This would definitely no longer be UTF-8! Martin.
