On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:35 PM Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> I thought the whole premise of GB18030 was that it was Unicode mapped into > a GB2312 framework. What characters exist in GB18030 that don't exist in > Unicode, and have they been proposed for Unicode yet, and why was none of > the PUA space considered appropriate for that in the meantime? > My memory of GB18030 is that its code space has 1.6M code points, of which 1.1M are a permutation of Unicode. For the rest you would have to go beyond the Unicode code space for 1:1 round-trip mappings. Just please don't call it UTF-8. markus
