On 02/22/2016 02:54 PM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
> This technique can be generalized such that the thread doesn't start until 
> all arguments are ready, and arguments do not
> have to be ready or passed at thread creation time as follows:
>
>   thread worker(<<@, <<@, <<@....)
>
>   and worker() would be defined as
>
> procedure worker(arg1, arg2, arg3,...., argn)

And, I assume, worker could be written as:

     procedure worker(A[])

right?

-- 
Steve Wampler -- swamp...@noao.edu
The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to