On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Steve Wampler <swamp...@noao.edu> wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 02:54 PM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
> > This technique can be generalized such that the thread doesn't start
> until all arguments are ready, and arguments do not
> > have to be ready or passed at thread creation time as follows:
> >
> > thread worker(<<@, <<@, <<@....)
> >
> > and worker() would be defined as
> >
> > procedure worker(arg1, arg2, arg3,...., argn)
>
> And, I assume, worker could be written as:
>
> procedure worker(A[])
>
> right?
Yes, if you have along list of arguments or have a variable number of
arguments. This would allow worker() to be instantiated in different places
using a different numbers of <<@ if you will.
--Jafar
> --
> Steve Wampler -- swamp...@noao.edu
> The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Unicon-group mailing list
> Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
