I know I've been raiding Rosetta for Icon/Unicon stuff for a few weeks now. I'm pretty sure I'm in there somewhere. :)
On Aug 2, 2016 8:38 AM, "Sergey Logichev" <slogic...@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hello, all! > I slightly reworked the code presented at Rosetta to get popularity > visualization. Maybe not much elegant but working. > BTW Icon on the 22nd place! > Visualization here > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B29GNeP2Wp0KRTV0ZnZjYzhzUVU > The script here > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B29GNeP2Wp0KV0V2NW43NURnNGs > > Sergey > > 01.08.2016, 19:04, "btiffin" <btif...@vivaldi.net>: > > On 2016-08-01 17:06, p...@firefly.nlm.nih.gov wrote: > > Go ahead. When I wrote the original code there were two distinct ways > of getting the popularity rating, each giving a different value. > > --Phillip > > > Thanks, Phillip. > > A patch is in, with an updated output fragment, (Icon was listed at > position 26, so it didn't seem quite right to limit the fragment to the > top 20 or 25). > > Nice code by the way, a good learning exercise, and hopefully I didn't > tarnish your good name with the patch. > > And yes, the talk page is full of chatter about how the rules should > work, and questions about how accurate the counts are, given the various > methods used. > > There will be another update soonish, to account for some of the names > having Unicode characters now. Those code points bork the right and > left field padding calculations. > > Have good, make well, > Brian > > > On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, btiffin wrote: > > On 2016-07-30 14:38, Steve Wampler wrote: > > On 07/30/2016 02:18 AM, btiffin wrote: > > And one last issue, the Rosetta Code entry for the Rank by > popularity > seems busted > > > http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code/Rank_languages_by_popularity#Icon_and_Unicon > > I think the output format changed, so that sample is only picking up > the > first 500 entries, and missing out on the continue page. > > > Yes - some change to the input to the program definitely broke it. > It > should be > marked as broken (or removed!) until someone [uh, that'd be you?] > > > If no one has objections, I'll post that code as an update. > > replaces it with > a correct version. > > > It corrects the pass, but I'll give everyone here a chance to yell > stop, > if the new code reflects badly on Unicon. :-) > > Cheers, > Brian > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Unicon-group mailing list > Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Unicon-group mailing list > Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Unicon-group mailing list > Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
