On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Devin Ben-Hur <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Excellent points Michael. But to Bráulio's original request, it would be > lovely to factor out the clean and robust process management parts of > unicorn (daemonization, pidfile-mgmt, pre-load, fork, reap, signaling) > separate from the HTTP/Rack server. This would give us a robust supervisor > for asynchronous workers that reduce memory footprint with CoW and responds > to a well understood set of signals for management. > Take a look at resque-pool (https://github.com/nevans/resque-pool) for one example of a pre-existing solution. I'm sure there are others. --Michael
