Pirate Praveen <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you mention the recommended way of adding unicorn in a Gemfile in > your home page?
I'm not very knowledgeable about bundler, but app servers probably should not be in any packaged Gemfile at all. > gitlab and diaspora has unicorn in their Gemfile, for a user they want > gitlab or diaspora and they don't care if its using unicorn or puma or > passenger. > > I need some kind of an official statement about compatibility which I > can show to projects like gitlab and diaspora, so they don't insist on > exact patch release of unicorn. I could patch the Gemfile, but that > adds extra burden on me as a maintainer which I'd like to avoid if > possible. "Official statements" do not have much weight behind them; history does. They can look at the git history (especially that of manpages and documentation) to see the only feature removals were for undocumented cruft. Personally, I intensely dislike "official" things; so people shouldn't take what I (or anybody) writes as gospel. -- unsubscribe: [email protected] archive: http://bogomips.org/unicorn-public/
