Pirate Praveen <[email protected]> wrote: > With debian packaging, our aim is to get a user setup an application > like gitlab or diaspora, just using the package manager they are > already familiar with. They don't have to know what language it is > written, what framework or application server or what database it is > using, all they are interested is the application specific configuration
I suggest webrick. It's not bad nowadays with Ruby 2.x and is the only standard server in Ruby. For out-of-the-box use, unicorn is probably the worst possible default since it requires nginx. > How much compatibility we can expect for config/unicorn.rb? I assume you mean the Unicorn::Configurator class (in lib/unicorn/configurator.rb). That won't change, it hasn't changed since 2009 as I mentioned in: http://bogomips.org/unicorn-public/20150929193627.GA7572%40dcvr.yhbt.net/ -- unsubscribe: [email protected] archive: http://bogomips.org/unicorn-public/
