Erez,
Diffing the sources, all I find are changes of the date from 2011 to 2013 in the copyright notices at the top of the files - at least for my 2.6 and 3.2 kernels. I've applied these cosmetic patches to my production kernels - thereby giving myself the feeling that unionfs is not dead, and that I needn't to worry about find a replacement. :-) I assume that the real work was forward porting the to the newer kernels? That's of course quite useful and I do intend someday to move to a later kernel, but according to this link at kernel.org https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html linux-3.2 will be around the longest. Will unionfs be getting and bug fixes/enhancements in the future? Thanks Mark _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
