Thanks Lonnie. With every new linux kernel, it’s getting just a bit more work to maintain N+1 kernels. :-)
Erez. On Jan 10, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Erez, > > Many thanks that unionfs lives on. We (AstLinux project) have used unionfs > for many years, relieved we don't have to find a replacement. > > We are currently using unionfs 2.5.11 on Linux 2.6.35 and it has been rock > solid. > > I'd like to cast my vote for a rock solid unionfs version for long-long-term > Linux 3.2.53+ . I have seen some reports like this: > http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/2012-August/006139.html > > Thanks again, > Lonnie _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
