Klaus Knopper:
> That makes absolutely sense to me now, since I had the same kind of crashes
> with negative dentry->d_count numbers.
All whiteout prefix bug was related to creating files and dirs.
Almost all people using unionfs on Intel processor would meet this kind
of crash.
> A Macro would waste some space for duplicate string constants, I would
> rather vote for something like
>
> const char whiteout_prefix[] = ".wh.";
Contemporary compilers can optimize string constants and they will not
waste spaces. But I agree with you. Yours is better.
> Example (using /var/www, which is not empty):
:::
> Other example:
:::
I will try them later, both on my nfs case and your iso9660/tmpfs case.
Junjiro Okajima
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
