Hello,

> 2.6.12.5 with unionfs-20050923-1803 has the same problem and the latest
> unionfs release has it also.

same for 2.6.12.2 and unionfs-1.0.14 (next: unionfs-1.0.13).

Here is a demonstration of the described effect. I created 500 files
from 1 ... 500:

        (hostname) [/data/merged/SHIT] ls -1 | head -1
        This is a very long pathname to test unionfs here we go 1
        (hostname) [/data/merged/SHIT] ls -1 | wc -l
        59
        (abortium) [/data/merged/SHIT] ls -1 /data/.data0/SHIT/| wc -l
        502

Sincerely,
        Thomas
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

Reply via email to