hi Thomas,
i used the attached shell script with the latest snapshot of
unionfs and a 2.6.11 kernel. it seems to be working fine. This is what i
got for the commands that you had mentioned:ls -1 | head -1 total 0 ls -l | wc -l 501 ls -l | head -2 total 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 23 14:30 This is a very long pathname to test unionfs here we go 0 All the files have been created in the .data0 directory. could you send us more information or check if the attached shell script works for you ? thanks and regards, -A. =================================== # Arun M. Krishnakumar # # Graduate Student # # Department of Computer Science # # SUNY, Stony Brook # =================================== > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:09:24 -0400 > From: Dave Quigley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Problem: Union doesn't work for big directories > > Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > > >Hello, > > > > > > > >>same for 2.6.12.2 and unionfs-1.0.14 (next: unionfs-1.0.13). > >> > >> > > > >2.6.12.2 and unionfs-1.0.13 works for me. > > > > Thomas > >_______________________________________________ > >unionfs mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs > > > > > > > Hello Thomas I have filled your bug in our bugzilla under the number 415 > > https://bugzilla.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=415 > > Dave Quigley > _______________________________________________ > unionfs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs >
415.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
_______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
