Hi there, has anything happended regarding this one:
"A feature we're considering (and we'll test it), is a mount option to force aggressive revalidation of dentries etc. This means that essentially unionfs won't be caching objects itself, but it'd depend on those cached on behalf of the lower file systems. This will have the benefit of showing lower changes immediately, at the expense of slower performance. We'll test to see just how much performance overhead this has." or am I just blind and can not find the trick? Regards Christian Celler
pgpMZCyozvNyK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
