On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:31:57PM +0100, Christian Celler wrote: > Hi there, > > has anything happended regarding this one: > > "A feature we're considering (and we'll test it), is a mount > option to force aggressive revalidation of dentries etc. > This means that essentially unionfs won't be caching objects > itself, but it'd depend on those cached on behalf of the > lower file systems. This will have the benefit of showing > lower changes immediately, at the expense of slower > performance. We'll test to see just how much performance > overhead this has." > > or am I just blind and can not find the trick?
As far as I know, there has been no progress done with that feature since there are some more pressing issues to be solved (eg. leaks.) Jeff. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
