On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:29:18PM -0500, Charles P. Wright wrote: > Martin, > > Thanks for the kind words about Unionfs. We plan on having a release > just as soon was we get the regression test working (there is a nasty > refcount bug involving rename of directories). > > This patch looks good, but I have one minor suggestion. Instead of > making this a mount-wide option, how about a per-branch option. Instead > of something like: > > mount -t unionfs -o dirs=/b0:/b1=ro,nfsperms=insecure none /mnt/unionfs > > How about: > mount -t unionfs -o dirs=/b0:/b1=nfsro none /mnt/unionfs > > Jeff, in the interim, please apply this patch.
Ok, applied. Jeff. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
