Charles P. Wright schrieb: > This patch looks good, but I have one minor suggestion. Instead of > making this a mount-wide option, how about a per-branch option. Instead > of something like: > > mount -t unionfs -o dirs=/b0:/b1=ro,nfsperms=insecure none /mnt/unionfs > > How about: > mount -t unionfs -o dirs=/b0:/b1=nfsro none /mnt/unionfs > well you are right. it was my first intention as well to implement a per-branch option but i thought additional branch options are undesirable. i guess i just misunderstood some previous mails about the "ro_wh" option ;-)
watch out for the next nfsro-patch ;-) martin _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
