On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 06:26 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Guten Morgen Herr Jansen. > > Hans-Peter Jansen: > > I'm desperately seeking a (short time) fix for the /proc problem to get > > my SuSE 9.3 diskless NFS setup going until the unionfs crew come along > > with an "official" fix. How did you solved this in your environment? > > Still based on this patch? The "statically linking" order isn't very > > appealing, since I try very hard to keep the distribution kernel > > untouched, if possible somehow. > > Current unionfs can handle hard link under nfs branch corrrectly, so we > don't need the "nfs link patch" anymore, nor static link. > About /proc soft link problem, I guess Shaya Potter's mmap patch is the > answer. But I didn't try it and it seems to be needed some fixing, for > example lseek at readdir.
ooo, please point out problems. I'm unsure why readdir should be a problem though, I only should be touching read()/write()/readpage()/writepage() code paths, don't see why that would break readdir? please point out hte problem, as I don't want to hit it in the future :). _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
