In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Engelhardt writes:
> >> Hey list,
> >> 
> >> is there a reason -- besides "usual" excuses ;) -- unionfs is not handled
> >> in an svn repository?
> >
> >Yes, but they're just "excuses."
> >
> Too bad. :)

Yes, too bad that the world seems to have split off the OSS-ish source mgmt
systems: cvs, svn, bk, perforce, etc.  Right now, I'm "stuck" w/ CVS b/c it
works (flawed as it is) and it's available everywhere and comes w/ most
systems.

When the world have settled on a clear winner to replace CVS, which will
come pre-bundled with most systems I run (nearly 30 flavors of Unix), I'll
migrate my entire CVS server (95 repositories totaling 13GB).

> Jan Engelhardt

Erez.
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

Reply via email to