> >Yes, too bad that the world seems to have split off the OSS-ish source mgmt >systems: cvs, svn, bk, perforce, etc. Right now, I'm "stuck" w/ CVS b/c it
bk and OSS? I must have missed something. >When the world have settled on a clear winner to replace CVS, which will >come pre-bundled with most systems I run (nearly 30 flavors of Unix), I'll >migrate my entire CVS server (95 repositories totaling 13GB). Well I asked because svn (bk too) do directory revisioning rather than per-file revisioning. When using CVS, the next best approach to grab a cvs tree copy where multiple files have changed within a few seconds (one commit basically), is using cvs's -D to checkout. Jan Engelhardt -- _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
