On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Josef Sipek wrote: > > To do this is as simple as doing a rmdir union1 command. > > Heh. Nice idea, but I think most people would still use umount. It has > essentially the same things to do - although the rmdir way needs to do some > things that are done automatically by the mount/umount syscall. > > > The same is done with branches also and we can > > possibly update the union while removing the branch so the user doesn't > > need the extra step but that isn't clear yet. > > Hrm. Interesting. I kind of like the more explicit: > > echo 1 > /unionfs/union1/branch1/remove > > But it is essentially the same concept.
I like it, but what if the union is the root filesystem? Martin _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
